This Week on perl5-porters - 1-8 March 2008

This Week on perl5-porters - 1-8 March 2008

"I personally think that the git tools have far too many ways to do the same thing (a complaint levelled against Perl itself at times) for the normal human to comprehend, let alone remember." -- John Peacock, gitting used to the idea of a new code repository.

Topics of Interest

ExtUtils::Install updates

Michael G. Schwern released a new version of the venerable ExtUtils::MakeMaker distribution, partly to include ExtUtils::Install version 1.45. Unfortunately Yves Orton had, in the meantime, pushed out version 1.46 which closed out a number of bug reports which had been quietly gathering dust in the RT queue.

The changes caused a ripple of failures to show up in smoke tests. Yves had everything squared up again as of version 1.50.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00004.html

A side thread on the same issue was started by Jerry D. Hedden concerning problems with the module on Cygwin. One of the problems encountered was the broken behaviour of Archive::Tar with respect to the WinZip archive tool on Windows. Apparently due to concerns with Solaris interoperability, Archive::Tar will construct a tar file for which WinZip is unable to discern the directory structure, thus causing everything to be extracted into the current directory.

  bit of a hassle, that
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00056.html

Interesting self contained task

In the follow-up to the discussion of getting fresh blood hacking on the core, Joshua ben Jore pointed to his perlguts talk with a focus on the op-tree. Eric Wilhelm reminded people of the importance of the Google Summer of Code with respect to getting new people hacking on perl.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00007.html

This lead to further discussion of the Summer of Code, with cross-pver from the pm_groups mailing list, about how similar the effort required is to herding cats.

  don't be eval
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00009.html

Eric put out a formal call for an official p5p cat-herder to coordinate the issues between the SoC and the perl5 porters. I hope he received a flood of off-list replies.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00015.html

List::Util::sum() doesn't handle overloading

Jan Dubois uncovered a glaring inconsistency between the XS and pure-Perl implementations of the sum routine: the XS version doesn't deal with objects that overload + correctly.

Yves Orton recalled previous discussions on the matter and the concensus was that the XS version was built for speed, which leads to things like overloading being ignored. Michael G. Schwern thought that he'd rather settle for slightly slower and always right, rather than slightly faster and sometimes subtly wrong. Nicholas Clark wanted to know how much slower an XS version that handles overloading would turn out to be.

  premature evil
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00021.html

ext/Time/Piece/Piece.xs use of strptime

The FreeBSD copyright statement in Time::Piece went from Matt Sergeant to blead. A patch from blead to silence a warning on Windows with the Borland C compiler was sent back in return to Matt.

  two-way street
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00036.html

glob() implementation

Peter Dintelmann wondered why he kept winding up with csh semantics for glob rather than bsd semantics, as the documentation suggested. Adriano Ferreira pointed out that csh_glob is implemented in terms of bsd_glob anyway.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00040.html

PL_destroyhook race condition

Dave Mitchell had identified a potential race condition where two threads try to destroy an object and in an "After you", "No, after you" scenario and the object would be freed but no-one would call its destructor.

Jerry D. Hedden thought this was an ugly state of affairs, and after mulling a long time over the code, could not see how to resolve the issue. He finally began to wonder whether the race condition could actually be provoked. So he wrote a program to try and exercise it, but didn't encounter the failure.

Jerry wasn't sure whether this was because there was truly no was no race condition, or that his program was not subtle enough to coax it to the surface.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00050.html

Jerry also wondered whether this patch could be backported to the 5.8 track, or whether it broke binary compatibility.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00058.html

POSIX::access(...) returns "0 but true"

Jerry D. Hedden was having trouble with POSIX::access returning the magic value '0 but true' for both writable and non-writable directories, so a test was failing when it shouldn't be on Cygwin and Win32.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00053.html

Perl @ 33218 (continued)

The current maintenance snapshot that will lead to 5.8.9 is currently stuck on Stratus VOS, since the test suite of Module::Pluggable has a file that begins with '-' (dash, hyphen, minus...) and this is a no-go on that platform.

Nicholas Clark couldn't remember what the other issues were. Consulting previous summaries would lead one to conclude that there is an unresolved issue concerning POSIX::strftime as well.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00071.html

A long back-and-forth between Nicholas and Steve Hay finished up with a warnings-free build on Win32. The main issue was one of casts causing warnings.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00073.html

In another thread, Jerry D. Hedden coordinated with Nicholas to quash the remaining 5.8.x build warnings under Cygwin.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00090.html

From Perforce to git

Sam Vilain reported that he had achieved a complete Perforce-to-git migration, and it was now being updated (albeit with a slight lag) with changes in real time. He asked for people to have a hard look to see if they could find any conversion errors.

Nicholas enquired as to whether there would be an easy way to map a Perforce change number to a git commit (answer: yes, a couple). He was also wondering how he would be able to cherry pick patches from blead for application to the various maint tracks.

  git along
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00078.html

Shortly afterwards, Rafael announced the switch to git. John Peacock deeply regretted not having been able to complete the Perforce to Subversion project, but a new job in Real Life had eaten all his tuits.

One of the main issues that needs to be sorted out is a simple "git for perl5 porters" cheat sheet, that supply a minimum list of commands one needs to know. The other point for early adopters to remember is that the repository is likely to be torn down and rebuilt, this time encoded in UTF-8 rather than Latin-1.

(Note to non-native English speakers: the "g" in "git" is pronounced with a voiced velar plosive (a hard G), like "give" or "get").

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00138.html

More TLC for opcode.pl

Jim Cromie continued to tweak opcode.pl this week, by adding comments to explain its behaviour and deobfuscating the syntax a bit. He reasoned that because it is so rarely used by people outside the inner circle that it needs to be able to stand on its own two feet a bit better. But the patch got a bit messed up and he'll probably have to do it again, since no-one actually applied it.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00113.html

5.10.0 and Math::Pari (and Fedora)

Tom "spot" Callaway wondered if there was a fix for Math::Pari on 5.10, since it was broken, but it is also a dependency for a couple of Crypt::* modules. Nicholas Clark wondered what the authors had to say for themselves, having encountered comments like

  int numargs = ((CV*)cv)->sv_any->xof_off; /* XXXX Nasty of us... */

Nicholas Clark was slightly miffed by the corners cut in the XS code. The extensive restructuring of the internals that went into the 5.10 release was theoretically "off limits" to client XS code, but it turns out that the Pari code was running around stuffing pointers and ints in all sorts of places that weren't expected to hold them. This caused a variety of failures that Nicholas wasn't really inclined to fix.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00124.html

In his race against time, Tom also reported that Data::Structure::Util was also failing its tests on 5.10.0. Nicholas Clark saw that this (and other) module(s) are authored by Fotango, and since Fotango no longer officially exists, they are thus all orphan modules.

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wondered what else was on Fedora's list of modules from hell, to which Tom replied that perlbal (A Perl-based proxy balancer) was also blowing black smoke, but felt that it was not a show-stopper.

Also problematic was Sys::Virt, PDL and Test::AutoBuild.

Yves Orton suggested Tom run with the slow @_ parameter passing speed-up patch, slated for 5.10.1 (and that Tom should make sure that it is clear in the output from perl -v that it is in there, to help with future bug reports from Fedora users).

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00146.html

Nicholas Clark did a fine piece of sleuthing work on PDL and discovered that a random number generator part of the code was not calling a function like drand48, which led to predictable results.

  Not good if you want unpredictable results
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00231.html

He also solved the Devel::Profiler 5.10.0 failure that Tom uncovered. As for B::TerseSize, Nicholas suggested Tom get in touch with Philip Gollucci.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00195.html

Perl @ 33444

Nicholas made another snapshot for 5.8.9 and asked what else was broken apart from the Stratus VOS issues. Craig A. Berry reported that a smoke test from a patchlevel a few changes earlier was having problems with threads and ExtUtils. The latter he suggested could be marked TODO if necessary, mainly because a certain amount of test failures are for tests that weren't around in 5.8.8 in the first place.

Jerry D. Hedden listed a number of dual-life CPAN modules that were out of date with respect to maint. Nicholas gave them a 50/50 chance.

Reini Urban summarised the problems on Cygwin. The work Jan Dubois made on the compiler switches, to allow gcc to be binary compatible with VC probably won't make it in until 5.12.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00127.html

Problems occurred on Mac OS X 10.5, and the resolution was made harder by the lack of strace/truss tool to analyse system calls. I think Nicholas had it all sorted out in the end.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00203.html

File/Glob/t/basic.t intermittently fails test 6

Dominic Dunlop noted that this test would fail from time to time on darwin 9.2.0 and he couldn't see why. Nor could Nicholas. Dominic and Steve Peters had suspicions about the C implementation of glob, as some parts of it remain unchanged since the day the code was originally checked in.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00137.html

Patches of Interest

make Archive::Extract's x.lzma test file be lzma'd, not uupacktool'd

Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes noticed that a data file that was supposed to be encoded with lzma was in fact encoded with uupack instead. So he encoded it the right way, and Rafael applied the patch.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00082.html

count-only transliteration needlessly makes copy-on-write scalars normal

Yitzchak also made tr behave cleanly in the face of copy-on-write strings.

  moo
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00112.html

Pushing parent.pm

Yitzchak also thought that now that the issue of the API of parent has been settled, then base could be marked as discouraged

  not yet deprecated
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00128.html

New and old bugs from RT

/^.../m is slower than logical alternatives (#33051)

Rob Kinyon (dragonchild on Perlmonks) reported a problem where one regexp was logically equivalent to another... but two orders of magnitude slower.

This was on perl 5.8.4. Steve Peters noted that the difference was lost in the noise on 5.10, and 5.8.8 did not appear to be affected either.

  not any more
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00047.html

pod2usage(-verbose => 0) & pod2usage(-verbose => 1) (#39775)

Steve Peters also saw that the patch in this bug report had been applied to a version of Pod::Parser (version 1.35).

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00049.html

Counting bug in Test::Harness with unexpected early exit (#43267)

Steve Peters thought that this bug could be marked resolved, since its twin sister on the CPAN RT queue was marked as resolved over there. Andy Dougherty regretfully informed Steve that the solution given for resolving it was "upgrade to Test::Harness version 3".

Alas, in the code freeze during the push to 5.10, Test::Harness 3 was considered too raw for inclusion, and the bug in the RT ticket concerns version 2. Andy, having taken a stab at fixing the bug in Test::Harness 2.64, suggested that if the problem was sufficiently annoying to people, then they should upgrade to Test::Harness 3 (which appears to be settling down nicely).

Rafael hinted that Test::Harness 3 will probably be released during the 5.10 maintenance track. One of the reasons being, as Michael G. Schwern points out, it's so much nicer to work with than screen scraping test output.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00051.html

make Devel::Peek::mstat always available (#46957)

Slaven Rezic had filed a bug report with a patch. Steve took the patch, applied it, and closed the report. The fix will be of interest to people who like compiling perl with PERL_DEBUGGING_MSTATS.

Slaven had also noted in the report that compiling with PLAIN_MALLOC no longer works. This was not addressed (but I imagine it's not serious).

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00046.html

5.9.5 fails make test on AIX 5.3 (#47415)

Continuing his trawl through the 1700+ unresolved bugs in the RT queue, Steve asked for Config information to help him understand what the problem was.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00054.html

Use of uninitialized value in die at /opt/perl/lib/perl5/File/Copy.pm line 224. (#49660)

Steve Peters tried to close this one as well, but Marc Lehmann replied that the problem remained, although it was very tricky to provoke the bug on demand. And the trouble is that the symptom is the removal of the source file.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00026.html

Not OK: perl 5.11.0 +DEVEL on i686-linux 2.6.22-3-486 (#50080)

No-one begrudged Steve closing this one with some vague waving of hands, citing that patch or patches unknown had conspired to fix the issue.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00027.html

prototypes sneakily break lvalue subs (#51408)

L. Mai filed the only new bug this week, showing how prototypes interact with lvalue subs in unexpected ways.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00103.html

Perl5 Bug Summary

  288 new + 1501 open = 1789 (+4 -2)
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00043.html
  http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/perl5/Overview.html

In Brief

The Google summer of code mentoring thread was wrapped up this week, with Eric Wilhelm explaining a mentor for a GSoC project had to do, and what they received in return (a T-shirt).

  what mentoring meant
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00001.html

Jesse Vincent announce the release of the rt.cpan.org source code.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00045.html

Back in November 2007, Marcel Grünauer wrote a patch to fix the NEXT.pm bug within overloaded stringification. This week Nicholas Clark applied it.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00052.html

In regards to the op/sprintf.t and op/write.t failures with mingw-runtime-3.14, Nicholas Clark commented that if Sisyphus (or anyone) was able to figure out a test probe to identify if the local environment was running with the buggy library, that they would be able to work around it during build configuration.

  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00064.html

The checkpods program is going to face the sound of the chain-saw and/or be subsumed into podchecker.

  cruft culler
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00065.html

H.Merijn Brand went digging around in Devel::PPPort and perlguts to get Text::CVS_XS to run on everything from 5.005 to 5.10. Tim Bunce thought a newSVpv needed to be wrapped in a sv_2mortal, but that led to an attempt to free unreferenced scalar.

  DDTT
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00111.html

No, the list is not blocking inline patches in messages.

  at least, not on purpose
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00173.html

Jarkko Hietaniemi wondered if he was having an attack of the 64-bit perls. Three modules of his, quite different internally, were popping up with test failures on 64-bit systems.

  the 64-bit question
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00180.html

Last week's summary

Juerd Waalboer clarified a couple of points in the Unicode debate, and asked a couple of questions. Notably whether it was true that Perl on EBCDIC was broken.

Nicholas Clark replied that it was false to state that it doesn't, as in actual fact we don't have any information to confirm or refute the hypothesis that Perl runs on EBCDIC.

  24-29 February 2008
  http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00174.html

About this summary

This summary was written by David Landgren.

Weekly summaries are published on http://use.perl.org/ and posted on a mailing list, (subscription: perl5-summary-subscribe@perl.org). The archive is at http://dev.perl.org/perl5/list-summaries/. Corrections and comments are welcome.

If you found this summary useful, please consider contributing to the Perl Foundation to help support the development of Perl.